ETHV vs. BCDF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF).

ETHV and BCDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHV is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. BCDF is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Aug 1, 2022.

Performance

ETHV vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHV vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-29.44%	-11.02%	-3.67%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	1.72%	11.63%	9.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHV achieves a -29.44% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.

ETHV

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: 9.00%
• YTD: -29.44%
• 6M: -49.70%
• 1Y: 14.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 13.04%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

BCDF

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF

ETHV

VanEck Ethereum ETF

Return for Risk

ETHV vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 20
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 43
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHV	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	0.78	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.19	-0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	1.40	-1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	3.61	-3.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHV vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHV Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHV and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHV	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	0.78	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.38	-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and BCDF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ETHV vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.48%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHV	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-27.70%	-36.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.66%	-8.84%	-52.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.75%	-5.09%	-51.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.39%	-10.23%	-20.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.40%	3.44%	+26.96%

Volatility

ETHV vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that ETHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHV	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.28%	5.22%	+14.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.50%	11.75%	+41.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.80%	16.82%	+58.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.88%	17.06%	+57.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.88%	17.06%	+57.82%