ETHU vs. BTRN
ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHU is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHU returned -76.14% vs -17.28% for BTRN. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHU charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
ETHU vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHU achieves a -72.13% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.20% return.
ETHU
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -45.48%
- YTD
- -72.13%
- 6M
- -75.88%
- 1Y
- -76.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -72.13% | -64.38% | -49.29% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | 4.89% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHU and BTRN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ETHU and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHU vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
ETHU
BTRN
ETHU vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHU | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.69 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -1.17 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHU | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | -0.88 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.00 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ETHU vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHU drawdown since its inception was -95.18%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHU and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHU | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.18% | -36.97% | -58.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.80% | -25.29% | -66.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.18% | -25.22% | -69.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -14.43% | -55.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.60% | 14.76% | +47.84% |
Volatility
ETHU vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.93%. This indicates that ETHU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHU | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 6.93% | +13.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.47% | 10.35% | +82.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.43% | 19.84% | +117.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 30.94% | +112.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 30.94% | +112.02% |
ETHU vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHU has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHU vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than BTRN's 30.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.16% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHU and BTRN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHU has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to BTRN (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHU dropped -95.18% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -17.28% vs -76.14% for ETHU. On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -17.28% return vs -76.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 5.16% for ETHU.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHU and 0.95% for BTRN.
ETHU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHU and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer