ETHT vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHT returned -74.56% vs 1640.62% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

ETHT vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -75.59% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,030.31% return.

ETHT

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -33.42%
• YTD: -75.59%
• 6M: -75.81%
• 1Y: -74.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 25.30%
• YTD: 1,030.31%
• 6M: 892.97%
• 1Y: 1,640.62%
• 3Y*: 128.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHT vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	-75.59%	-64.86%	-45.44%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,030.31%	96.22%	-43.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHT and BWET is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

ETHT vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHT

ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHT vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHT	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	16.89	-17.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	6.36	-6.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.92	-0.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	54.19	-54.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	142.88	-144.02

ETHT vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHT and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHT vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHT	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.02%	-56.90%	-39.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.92%	-30.64%	-63.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.32%	0.00%	-95.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.63%	-23.78%	-43.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.41%	11.60%	+53.81%

Volatility

ETHT vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 39.52% compared to Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) at 25.51%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHT	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.52%	25.51%	+14.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.60%	88.96%	+5.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	137.92%	98.53%	+39.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.23%	70.43%	+72.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.23%	70.43%	+72.80%

ETHT vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHT vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.46%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	19.46%	4.57%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHT and BWET in my portfolio?

ETHT and BWET have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHT or BWET?

ETHT has higher volatility (39.52%) compared to BWET (25.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHT dropped -96.02% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, ETHT or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1640.62% vs -74.56% for ETHT. On fees, ETHT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BWET has been the lower-risk option at 25.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHT or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1640.62% return vs -74.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHT or BWET?

ETHT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHT or BWET?

ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 19.46%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between ETHT and BWET?

ETHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BWET is Commodities. ETHT tracks Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%), while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.