ETHT vs. BFOC
ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. ETHT is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETHT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
ETHT vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -73.01% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.46% return.
ETHT
- 1D
- -6.05%
- 1M
- 16.78%
- 6M
- -64.86%
- YTD
- -73.01%
- 1Y
- -85.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -74.84%
BFOC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.88K | $50.79K | $63.29K | |
| $15.50M | $16.35M | $20.04M |
ETHT vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | -73.01% | -58.12% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.46% | -9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHT and BFOC is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHT vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
ETHT
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHT vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHT vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.25% | -18.41% | -77.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.83% | -18.26% | -76.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.06% | -13.50% | -55.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.31% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHT vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 134.08% | 11.68% | +122.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.09% | 11.68% | +129.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.09% | 11.68% | +129.41% |
ETHT vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHT vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.73%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF | 17.73% | 4.57% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHT and BFOC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHT.
ETHT has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
ETHT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHT and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for ETHT and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer