ETHT vs. BCDF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF).

ETHT and BCDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 6, 2024. BCDF is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Aug 1, 2022.

Performance

ETHT vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHT vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	-60.06%	-64.86%	-41.68%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	1.72%	11.63%	15.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHT achieves a -60.06% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.

ETHT

• 1D: 7.31%
• 1M: 12.62%
• YTD: -60.06%
• 6M: -83.27%
• 1Y: -39.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 13.04%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHT vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

ETHT

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF

BCDF

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF

Return for Risk

ETHT vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHT

ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 12
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 43
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHT vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHT	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.78	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.19	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.15	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	1.40	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	3.61	-4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHT vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHT and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHT	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.78	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	0.38	-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between ETHT and BCDF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ETHT vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

ETHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than BCDF's 2.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	11.73%	4.57%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.48%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%

Drawdowns

ETHT vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHT drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHT and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHT	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.10%	-27.70%	-65.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.13%	-8.84%	-81.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.81%	-5.09%	-86.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.26%	-10.23%	-52.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.51%	3.44%	+48.07%

Volatility

ETHT vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a higher volatility of 37.83% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that ETHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHT	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.83%	5.22%	+32.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.97%	11.75%	+96.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.62%	16.82%	+134.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.59%	17.06%	+130.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.59%	17.06%	+130.53%