PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ETHR.TO
Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units
-28.50%-17.01%52.43%87.70%-65.64%54.91%
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
-21.88%-11.88%134.59%146.50%-62.36%-20.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHR.TO achieves a -28.50% return, which is significantly lower than EBIT.TO's -21.88% return.


ETHR.TO

1D
3.98%
1M
11.16%
YTD
-28.50%
6M
-50.03%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
10Y*

EBIT.TO

1D
1.85%
1M
5.14%
YTD
-21.88%
6M
-41.28%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
32.34%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ETHR.TO and EBIT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHR.TO
ETHR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EBIT.TO
EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHR.TOEBIT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

-0.49

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

-0.45

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.95

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

-0.45

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

-0.96

+1.19

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHR.TO and EBIT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHR.TOEBIT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-0.49

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.07

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ETHR.TO and EBIT.TO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHR.TO nor EBIT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHR.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.36%, roughly equal to the maximum EBIT.TO drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHR.TO and EBIT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHR.TOEBIT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.36%

-75.45%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.29%

-50.63%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.68%

-46.63%

-10.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.06%

-32.78%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.72%

23.74%

+6.98%

Volatility

ETHR.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.68% compared to Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) at 12.82%. This indicates that ETHR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHR.TOEBIT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.68%

12.82%

+6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.55%

36.35%

+16.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.21%

44.68%

+29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.62%

55.10%

+17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.62%

55.37%

+17.25%