ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO).
ETHR.TO and BTCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHR.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate. It was launched on Apr 19, 2021. BTCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.
Performance
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHR.TO Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units | -28.50% | -17.01% | 52.43% | 87.70% | -65.64% | 54.91% |
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | -23.52% | -9.18% | 116.50% | 149.22% | -65.78% | -20.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHR.TO achieves a -28.50% return, which is significantly lower than BTCC.TO's -23.52% return.
ETHR.TO
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- -28.50%
- 6M
- -50.03%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC.TO
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- -23.52%
- 6M
- -41.91%
- 1Y
- -20.75%
- 3Y*
- 29.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHR.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ETHR.TO
BTCC.TO
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHR.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.12 | -0.46 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | -0.41 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.44 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | -0.94 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHR.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | -0.46 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.06 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHR.TO and BTCC.TO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHR.TO nor BTCC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHR.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCC.TO drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHR.TO and BTCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHR.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.36% | -77.80% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.29% | -50.04% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.68% | -47.05% | -9.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.06% | -34.40% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.72% | 23.49% | +7.23% |
Volatility
ETHR.TO vs. BTCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.68% compared to Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) at 12.86%. This indicates that ETHR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHR.TO | BTCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.68% | 12.86% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.55% | 36.59% | +15.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.21% | 44.86% | +29.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.62% | 56.97% | +15.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.62% | 57.43% | +15.19% |