ETHO vs. QDVO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).

ETHO and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHO is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Etho Climate Leadership Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2015. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.

Performance

ETHO vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHO vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	2.47%	10.23%	3.50%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	-4.93%	20.16%	11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -4.93% return.

ETHO

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 22.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: -4.93%
• 6M: -2.40%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.

QDVO

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

ETHO

Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 57
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 70
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHO	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.14	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.79	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.26	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	2.13	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	7.94	-1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHO vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHO	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.14	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.92	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and QDVO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ETHO vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than QDVO's 11.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.84%	0.86%	0.69%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	11.17%	9.92%	2.79%

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-17.75%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.03%	-10.24%	-3.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.05%	-6.70%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-2.51%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	2.75%	+0.59%

Volatility

ETHO vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 5.38%. This indicates that ETHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	5.38%	+2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	9.78%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	18.61%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.61%	18.01%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	18.01%	+1.60%