ETHO vs. DRES

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. ETHO is passively managed, while DRES is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

ETHO vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHO having a 22.44% return and DRES slightly lower at 21.80%.

ETHO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.24%
• 6M: 16.53%
• YTD: 22.44%
• 1Y: 37.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRES

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 12.22%
• YTD: 21.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	22.44%	3.40%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	21.80%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and DRES is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 84
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHO	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.62	—	—

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-10.41%	-15.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-1.43%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.34%	-2.18%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	18.22%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	18.22%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	18.22%	+1.12%

ETHO vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.52%	0.22%	0.00%
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.70%	0.86%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and DRES in my portfolio?

ETHO and DRES have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or DRES?

On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or DRES?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or DRES?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

What is the main difference between ETHO and DRES?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.50% for DRES.