PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF (BBUS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS.AX's -15.01% return.


ETHI.AX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.13%
6M
3.44%
YTD
3.50%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*

BBUS.AX

1D
3.84%
1M
3.48%
6M
-13.05%
YTD
-15.01%
1Y
593.29%
3Y*
46.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ETHI.AX
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
3.50%4.56%27.20%22.81%-15.53%7.45%
BBUS.AX
BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF
-15.01%527.35%-34.99%-36.60%44.31%-18.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021

-0.70

The correlation between ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.70 (all time) to -0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHI.AX
ETHI.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.AX
BBUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF (BBUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHI.AXBBUS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-36.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

5.25

-4.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

16.24

-15.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

32.22

-30.87

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the BBUS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum BBUS.AX drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHI.AXBBUS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-77.93%

+52.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-33.50%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-70.97%

+55.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-29.37%

+27.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-36.11%

+31.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.42%

17.20%

-10.78%

Volatility

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) is 2.86%, while BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF (BBUS.AX) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that ETHI.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHI.AXBBUS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

7.21%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

24.68%

-14.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

881.65%

-869.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

404.42%

-390.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

404.42%

-389.69%

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BBUS.AX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHI.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Dividend Comparison

ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while BBUS.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS.AX
BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETHI.AX
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
1.55%1.86%2.11%4.40%2.43%5.04%10.20%3.90%1.69%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHI.AX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHI.AX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for BBUS.AX.

ETHI.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while BBUS.AX is Inverse Equities. ETHI.AX tracks Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while BBUS.AX tracks S&P 500 Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 1.32% for BBUS.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHI.AX and BBUS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer