PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGI.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than ESGI.AX's 6.43% return.


ETHI.AX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.31%
6M
4.06%
YTD
3.99%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*

ESGI.AX

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.59%
6M
4.93%
YTD
6.43%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ETHI.AX
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
3.99%4.56%27.20%22.81%-15.53%31.01%24.65%36.89%4.04%
ESGI.AX
VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF
6.43%6.29%23.14%16.95%-7.32%24.77%4.97%28.97%-2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018

0.74

The correlation between ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHI.AX
ETHI.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHI.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGI.AX
ESGI.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ESGI.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGI.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGI.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGI.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGI.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGI.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHI.AXESGI.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

1.38

+0.23

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the ESGI.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, which is greater than ESGI.AX's maximum drawdown of -22.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHI.AXESGI.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-22.88%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-14.92%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-14.92%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-19.38%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.51%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.42%

6.53%

-0.11%

Volatility

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) is 2.80%, while VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGI.AX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that ETHI.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGI.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHI.AXESGI.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.61%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

12.18%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

14.33%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

13.00%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

13.86%

+0.87%

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGI.AX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHI.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Dividend Comparison

ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than ESGI.AX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGI.AX
VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF
2.71%6.43%6.58%3.35%2.39%1.42%1.50%1.55%0.52%0.00%
ETHI.AX
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
1.55%1.86%2.11%4.40%2.43%5.04%10.20%3.90%1.69%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGI.AX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGI.AX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ETHI.AX.

ETHI.AX tracks Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while ESGI.AX tracks MSCI World ex Australia ex Fossil Fuel Select SRI and Low Carbon Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 0.55% for ESGI.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHI.AX and ESGI.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer