ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX
ETHI.AX (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) and CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ETHI.AX is passively managed, while CORE.AX is actively managed. Over the past year, ETHI.AX returned 9.57% vs 15.14% for CORE.AX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHI.AX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CORE.AX.
Performance
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than CORE.AX's 4.95% return.
ETHI.AX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 9.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- —
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF | 3.99% | 7.09% |
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 4.95% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHI.AX and CORE.AX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ETHI.AX and CORE.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ETHI.AX
CORE.AX
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHI.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.68 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 4.54 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, which is greater than CORE.AX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and CORE.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHI.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -10.20% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -10.20% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -2.60% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Volatility Comparison
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) at 2.12%. This indicates that ETHI.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORE.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHI.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 2.12% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 7.39% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 12.44% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 12.50% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 12.50% | +2.23% |
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CORE.AX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHI.AX vs. CORE.AX - Dividend Comparison
ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than CORE.AX's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 4.40% | 2.43% | 5.04% | 10.20% | 3.90% | 1.69% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHI.AX and CORE.AX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CORE.AX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CORE.AX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ETHI.AX.
They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Schroder. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 0.25% for CORE.AX.
Find the right allocation for ETHI.AX and CORE.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer