ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ETHI.AX (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) and BBOZ.AX (BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHI.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while BBOZ.AX is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETHI.AX returned 9.47%/yr vs -13.81%/yr for BBOZ.AX. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. ETHI.AX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BBOZ.AX.

Performance

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly higher than BBOZ.AX's -3.84% return.

ETHI.AX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.13%
• 6M: 3.44%
• YTD: 3.50%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: —

BBOZ.AX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 5.33%
• 6M: 0.89%
• YTD: -3.84%
• 1Y: -5.77%
• 3Y*: -14.11%
• 5Y*: -13.81%
• 10Y*: -20.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF	3.50%	4.56%	27.20%	22.81%	-15.53%	31.01%	24.65%	36.89%	6.85%	18.46%
BBOZ.AX BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF	-3.84%	-16.29%	-11.97%	-19.36%	-9.57%	-33.33%	-35.36%	-40.20%	8.71%	-17.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017	-0.54

The correlation between ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.45 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHI.AX

ETHI.AX Risk / Return Rank: 23
ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ETHI.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ETHI.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ETHI.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ETHI.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

BBOZ.AX

BBOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8
BBOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BBOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BBOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BBOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BBOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHI.AX	BBOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.20	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	-0.10	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.99	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	-0.32	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	-0.65	+2.01

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the BBOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum BBOZ.AX drawdown of -93.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHI.AX	BBOZ.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.44%	-93.82%	+68.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	-17.56%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.65%	-50.45%	+34.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-61.95%	+36.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-91.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-93.27%	+91.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-67.88%	+63.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.42%	8.69%	-2.27%

Volatility

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) is 2.86%, while BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that ETHI.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHI.AX	BBOZ.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	5.12%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.70%	22.92%	-13.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	27.56%	-15.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	30.12%	-16.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	33.41%	-18.68%

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BBOZ.AX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHI.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while BBOZ.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBOZ.AX BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.95%
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF	1.55%	1.86%	2.11%	4.40%	2.43%	5.04%	10.20%	3.90%	1.69%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX in my portfolio?

ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETHI.AX or BBOZ.AX?

On fees, ETHI.AX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHI.AX or BBOZ.AX?

ETHI.AX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BBOZ.AX.

What is the main difference between ETHI.AX and BBOZ.AX?

ETHI.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while BBOZ.AX is Inverse Equities. ETHI.AX tracks Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while BBOZ.AX tracks S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 1.29% for BBOZ.AX.