ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX
ETHI.AX (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) and AUDS.AX (BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHI.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while AUDS.AX is a Leveraged Currency fund actively managed by BetaShares. ETHI.AX is passively managed, while AUDS.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETHI.AX returned 9.47%/yr vs -6.34%/yr for AUDS.AX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ETHI.AX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for AUDS.AX.
Performance
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than AUDS.AX's 11.13% return.
ETHI.AX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- —
AUDS.AX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 19.39%
- 3Y*
- 0.40%
- 5Y*
- -6.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF | 3.50% | 4.56% | 27.20% | 22.81% | -15.53% | 31.01% | 24.65% | 36.89% | 6.85% | 18.46% |
AUDS.AX BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF | 11.13% | 17.80% | -21.57% | -2.54% | -21.29% | -17.41% | 10.39% | -5.64% | -22.18% | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHI.AX and AUDS.AX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017 | -0.04 |
The correlation between ETHI.AX and AUDS.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (3 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ETHI.AX
AUDS.AX
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF (AUDS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHI.AX | AUDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.73 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 4.38 | -3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum AUDS.AX drawdown of -67.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and AUDS.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHI.AX | AUDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -67.00% | +41.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -10.87% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -29.91% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -50.71% | +25.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -52.47% | +51.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -39.53% | +34.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 4.23% | +2.19% |
Volatility
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) is 2.86%, while BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF (AUDS.AX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that ETHI.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUDS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHI.AX | AUDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 4.47% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 16.66% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 19.93% | -8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 24.05% | -10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 24.52% | -9.79% |
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AUDS.AX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHI.AX vs. AUDS.AX - Dividend Comparison
ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than AUDS.AX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUDS.AX BetaShares Strong Australian Dollar Complex ETF | 8.67% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.45% | 10.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 4.40% | 2.43% | 5.04% | 10.20% | 3.90% | 1.69% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHI.AX and AUDS.AX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHI.AX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHI.AX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for AUDS.AX.
ETHI.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while AUDS.AX is Leveraged Currency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 1.38% for AUDS.AX.
Find the right allocation for ETHI.AX and AUDS.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer