PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF
-30.39%-14.37%38.87%91.16%-69.16%51.50%
ETHR.TO
Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units
-28.50%-17.01%52.43%87.70%-65.64%54.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -30.39% return, which is significantly lower than ETHR.TO's -28.50% return.


ETHH.TO

1D
3.82%
1M
8.24%
YTD
-30.39%
6M
-50.72%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
1.08%
5Y*
10Y*

ETHR.TO

1D
3.98%
1M
11.16%
YTD
-28.50%
6M
-50.03%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHR.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHH.TO
ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHR.TO
ETHR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHH.TOETHR.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

0.12

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

0.73

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.11

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.26

0.23

+0.03

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is comparable to the ETHR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHH.TO and ETHR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHH.TOETHR.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.12

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.03

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ETHH.TO and ETHR.TO is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHH.TO nor ETHR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHR.TO drawdown of -78.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and ETHR.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHH.TOETHR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.46%

-78.36%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.39%

-62.29%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.88%

-56.68%

-6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-43.06%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.92%

30.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

ETHH.TO vs. ETHR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Evolve Ether ETF CAD Unhedged Units (ETHR.TO) have volatilities of 19.13% and 19.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHH.TOETHR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.13%

19.68%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

52.55%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.54%

74.21%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.91%

72.62%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.91%

72.62%

+1.29%