ETHE vs. GFOF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF).

ETHE and GFOF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHE is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the CoinDesk Ether Price Index . It was launched on Dec 14, 2017. GFOF is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2022. Both ETHE and GFOF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ETHE vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHE vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	-28.06%	-13.03%	44.14%	308.40%	-77.58%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	60.08%	145.49%	-68.58%

Returns By Period

ETHE

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 5.07%
• YTD: -28.06%
• 6M: -50.86%
• 1Y: 10.20%
• 3Y*: 26.95%
• 5Y*: -1.42%
• 10Y*: —

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHE vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.

ETHE

Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF

GFOF

Grayscale Future of Finance ETF

Return for Risk

ETHE vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE

ETHE Risk / Return Rank: 19
ETHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ETHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ETHE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ETHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ETHE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHE vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHE	GFOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHE	GFOF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE and GFOF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ETHE vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison

ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHE	GFOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.79%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.24%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHE	GFOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.68%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	194.12%	—	—