PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHE.SW vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ETHE.SW is traded in CHF, while FBTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBTC values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE.SW achieves a -38.22% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC's -25.56% return.


ETHE.SW

1D
-3.24%
1M
-20.52%
YTD
-38.22%
6M
-40.57%
1Y
-31.93%
3Y*
-4.42%
5Y*
-9.17%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.06%
1M
-17.64%
YTD
-25.56%
6M
-30.51%
1Y
-41.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHE.SW
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-38.22%-20.51%35.91%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.56%-18.35%112.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE.SW and FBTC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.49

The correlation between ETHE.SW and FBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE.SW
ETHE.SW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHE.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHE.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHE.SWFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.85

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.82

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-1.43

+0.53

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHE.SW Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHE.SW and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHE.SWFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

-0.95

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.22

-0.23

Drawdowns

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE.SW drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -50.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE.SW and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHE.SWFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-50.40%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.87%

-50.40%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.59%

-48.24%

-18.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.25%

-16.82%

-26.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.01%

28.86%

+7.15%

Volatility

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) has a higher volatility of 17.87% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 9.08%. This indicates that ETHE.SW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHE.SWFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.87%

9.08%

+8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.67%

34.23%

+26.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.96%

43.58%

+35.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.47%

51.02%

+33.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.11%

51.02%

+36.09%

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE.SW has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETHE.SW vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHE.SW nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHE.SW and FBTC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETHE.SW is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETHE.SW is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ETHE.SW and 0.25% for FBTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHE.SW and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer