PortfoliosLab logo
ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE.SW and ETH-USD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ETHE.SW:

-0.21

ETH-USD:

-0.12

Sortino Ratio

ETHE.SW:

0.40

ETH-USD:

0.88

Omega Ratio

ETHE.SW:

1.05

ETH-USD:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

ETHE.SW:

-0.14

ETH-USD:

0.06

Martin Ratio

ETHE.SW:

-0.31

ETH-USD:

0.50

Ulcer Index

ETHE.SW:

31.66%

ETH-USD:

31.84%

Daily Std Dev

ETHE.SW:

85.09%

ETH-USD:

62.61%

Max Drawdown

ETHE.SW:

-77.57%

ETH-USD:

-93.96%

Current Drawdown

ETHE.SW:

-49.82%

ETH-USD:

-44.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE.SW achieves a -26.24% return, which is significantly lower than ETH-USD's -19.58% return.


ETHE.SW

YTD

-26.24%

1M

63.03%

6M

-24.04%

1Y

-14.34%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ETH-USD

YTD

-19.58%

1M

65.16%

6M

-16.05%

1Y

-6.98%

5Y*

68.84%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE.SW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETHE.SW is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETHE.SW is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETHE.SW is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETHE.SW is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETHE.SW is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETHE.SW is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETH-USD is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETH-USD is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ETHE.SW Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHE.SW and ETH-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE.SW drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, smaller than the maximum ETH-USD drawdown of -93.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE.SW and ETH-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ETHE.SW vs. ETH-USD - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) and Ethereum (ETH-USD) have volatilities of 25.90% and 25.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...