PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHD vs. RAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHD vs. RAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 28.16% return, which is significantly higher than RAA's 9.10% return.


ETHD

1D
-0.69%
1M
-21.42%
6M
-13.33%
YTD
28.16%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-50.80%

RAA

1D
1.14%
1M
1.64%
6M
6.09%
YTD
9.10%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.91M$15.40M$23.23M
$1.34M$1.40M$1.58M

ETHD vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETHD and RAA is -0.59, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.59

The correlation between ETHD and RAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHD vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

RAA
RAA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETHD vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHDRAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.96

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

8.79

-8.59

ETHD vs. RAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the RAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHD and RAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHD vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than RAA's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and RAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHDRAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.59%

-11.96%

-83.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.14%

-5.91%

-49.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.99%

-2.14%

-87.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.60%

-1.65%

-65.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.65%

1.99%

+33.66%

Volatility

ETHD vs. RAA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 22.21% compared to SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) at 2.71%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHDRAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.21%

2.71%

+19.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.19%

8.19%

+80.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

133.41%

10.48%

+122.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.15%

12.63%

+127.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.15%

12.63%

+127.52%

ETHD vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHD vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison

ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than RAA's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
8.92%156.62%19.15%
RAA
SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF
2.10%2.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHD and RAA have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (22.21%) compared to RAA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs RAA's -11.96%.

On 1-year performance, RAA leads with 17.42% vs 6.93% for ETHD. On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RAA has performed better with a 17.42% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 8.92%, compared with 2.10% for RAA.

ETHD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SMI 3Fourteen. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.85% for RAA.

RAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHD and RAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer