ETHD vs. RAA
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while RAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by SMI Advisory Services. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETHD returned -42.18% vs 24.53% for RAA. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RAA.
Performance
ETHD vs. RAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 63.80% return, which is significantly higher than RAA's 11.05% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAA
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -83.65% |
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF | 11.05% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and RAA is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | -0.59 |
The correlation between ETHD and RAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
RAA
ETHD vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHD | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.48 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 4.17 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 16.80 | -17.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHD | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 2.60 | -2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 1.49 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than RAA's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and RAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -11.80% | -83.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.63% | -5.91% | -77.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.20% | -0.40% | -86.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -1.41% | -64.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.00% | 1.46% | +64.54% |
Volatility
ETHD vs. RAA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 19.00% compared to SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) at 2.92%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | RAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.00% | 2.92% | +16.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.37% | 7.44% | +84.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.23% | 9.49% | +126.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 12.71% | +129.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 12.71% | +129.48% |
ETHD vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than RAA's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF | 2.10% | 2.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and RAA have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to RAA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs RAA's -11.80%.
On 1-year performance, RAA leads with 24.53% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RAA has performed better with a 24.53% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.10% for RAA.
ETHD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SMI Advisory Services. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.85% for RAA.
RAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and RAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer