ETHD vs. GLNK
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHD is actively managed, while GLNK is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHD returned -42.18% vs -59.50% for GLNK. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.
Performance
ETHD vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 63.80% return, which is significantly higher than GLNK's -33.27% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLNK
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- -12.83%
- YTD
- -33.27%
- 6M
- -43.25%
- 1Y
- -59.50%
- 3Y*
- -10.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -72.49% | -42.57% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | -33.27% | -87.10% | -29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and GLNK is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024 | -0.53 |
The correlation between ETHD and GLNK shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (1 year) to -0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
GLNK
ETHD vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHD | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.95 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.68 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | -0.89 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHD | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | -0.55 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.01 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, roughly equal to the maximum GLNK drawdown of -95.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and GLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -95.82% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.63% | -88.29% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -95.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.20% | -95.71% | +8.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -55.70% | -10.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.00% | 66.68% | -0.68% |
Volatility
ETHD vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 19.00% compared to Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) at 15.43%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.00% | 15.43% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.37% | 46.79% | +45.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.23% | 109.57% | +26.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 164.87% | -22.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 164.87% | -22.68% |
ETHD vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, while GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and GLNK have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to GLNK (15.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs GLNK's -95.82%.
On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -42.18% vs -59.50% for GLNK. On fees, ETHD is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, GLNK has been the lower-risk option at 15.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -42.18% return vs -59.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHD is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for GLNK.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 2.50% for GLNK.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and GLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer