PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHD vs. BETE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHD vs. BETE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly higher than BETE's -33.38% return.


ETHD

1D
4.50%
1M
-14.26%
6M
64.16%
YTD
30.34%
1Y
-10.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BETE

1D
-1.90%
1M
1.02%
6M
-38.98%
YTD
-33.38%
1Y
-46.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHD vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
30.34%-72.49%-38.58%
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
-33.38%-8.17%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHD and BETE is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2024

-0.96

The correlation between ETHD and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHD vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BETE
BETE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHD vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHDBETEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.87

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.75

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

-1.19

+0.92

ETHD vs. BETE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHD Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the BETE Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHD and BETE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHD vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and BETE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHDBETEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.59%

-61.75%

-33.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.45%

-61.75%

+1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.82%

-56.32%

-33.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-22.93%

-44.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.15%

38.91%

-0.76%

Volatility

ETHD vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 29.48% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 12.76%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHDBETEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.48%

12.76%

+16.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.34%

40.89%

+53.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.33%

55.70%

+80.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.48%

56.32%

+85.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.48%

56.32%

+85.16%

ETHD vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BETE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHD vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison

ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than BETE's 78.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
78.32%68.22%15.22%0.78%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
5.71%156.62%19.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHD and BETE have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (29.48%) compared to BETE (12.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs BETE's -61.75%.

On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -10.25% vs -46.25% for BETE. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 12.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -10.25% return vs -46.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 78.32%, compared with 5.71% for ETHD.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.95% for BETE.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHD and BETE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer