ETHD vs. BETE
ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Over the past year, ETHD returned -42.18% vs -35.67% for BETE. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. ETHD charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETE.
Performance
ETHD vs. BETE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHD achieves a 63.80% return, which is significantly higher than BETE's -34.13% return.
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETE
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- YTD
- -34.13%
- 6M
- -38.03%
- 1Y
- -35.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -72.49% | -42.57% |
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -34.13% | -8.17% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHD and BETE is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024 | -0.96 |
The correlation between ETHD and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHD vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHD
BETE
ETHD vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHD | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.63 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | -1.07 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHD | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | -0.65 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.24 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
ETHD vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHD drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHD and BETE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHD | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.59% | -56.81% | -38.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.63% | -56.81% | -26.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.20% | -56.81% | -30.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -21.36% | -44.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.00% | 33.46% | +32.54% |
Volatility
ETHD vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a higher volatility of 19.00% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 9.55%. This indicates that ETHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHD | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.00% | 9.55% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.37% | 40.03% | +52.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.23% | 54.95% | +81.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 56.48% | +85.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.19% | 56.48% | +85.71% |
ETHD vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHD has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BETE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHD vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison
ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, less than BETE's 83.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 83.91% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHD and BETE have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to BETE (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHD dropped -95.59% vs BETE's -56.81%.
On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -35.67% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -35.67% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 83.91%, compared with 10.68% for ETHD.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for ETHD and 0.95% for BETE.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHD and BETE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer