ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE
ETHC.DE (21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by 21Shares, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). ETHC.DE is actively managed, while IS3N.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHC.DE returned -3.71%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHC.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHC.DE achieves a -39.39% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.
ETHC.DE
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -24.79%
- YTD
- -39.39%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -33.47%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHC.DE 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP | -39.39% | -21.50% | 52.05% | 90.66% | -17.54% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHC.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ETHC.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHC.DE
IS3N.DE
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.49 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.42 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 16.00 | -16.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.69 | -3.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.44 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.71%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHC.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -35.06% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.46% | -10.52% | -50.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.71% | -19.17% | -45.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.46% | -2.49% | -58.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.30% | -9.30% | -14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.26% | 2.91% | +33.35% |
Volatility
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that ETHC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 7.16% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.36% | 14.69% | +27.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.70% | 17.32% | +42.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 16.19% | +44.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 18.04% | +42.48% |
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHC.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHC.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHC.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
ETHC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETHC.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETHC.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer