ETHB vs. IVV
ETHB (iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
ETHB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.62M | $8.86M | $9.94M | |
| $3.36B | $3.31B | $5.91B |
ETHB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | -9.16% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB and IVV is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVV
ETHB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -55.25% | +19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.07% | -1.41% | -21.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -10.72% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
ETHB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 12.89% | +39.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 17.01% | +35.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.40% | 18.06% | +34.34% |
ETHB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
ETHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHB iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB and IVV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHB.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.20% for ETHB.
ETHB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IVV is S&P 500. ETHB tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHB and 0.03% for IVV.
Find the right allocation for ETHB and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer