ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE).

ETHB.DE and XLME.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHB.DE is an actively managed fund by 21Shares. It was launched on Mar 4, 2019. XLME.DE is an actively managed fund by 21Shares. It was launched on Apr 23, 2021.

Performance

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHB.DE 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP	-28.41%	-12.49%	43.63%	97.31%	-65.06%
XLME.DE 21Shares Stellar ETP	-19.94%	-38.16%	150.47%	77.39%	-73.47%

Different Trading Currencies

ETHB.DE is traded in USD, while XLME.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XLME.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHB.DE achieves a -28.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLME.DE's -19.94% return.

ETHB.DE

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: -28.41%
• 6M: -50.82%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLME.DE

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: -19.94%
• 6M: -56.41%
• 1Y: -39.07%
• 3Y*: 13.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHB.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XLME.DE's 2.50% expense ratio.

XLME.DE

21Shares Stellar ETP

ETHB.DE

21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP

Return for Risk

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHB.DE

ETHB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 18
ETHB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ETHB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ETHB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ETHB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ETHB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

XLME.DE

XLME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3
XLME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XLME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XLME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
XLME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
XLME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHB.DE	XLME.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	-0.52	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	-0.50	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.95	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.56	+0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	-0.97	+1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the XLME.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHB.DE and XLME.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHB.DE	XLME.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	-0.52	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	-0.15	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ETHB.DE and XLME.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHB.DE nor XLME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHB.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum XLME.DE drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB.DE and XLME.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHB.DE	XLME.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-82.74%	+12.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.68%	-69.69%	+9.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.38%	-73.99%	+19.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.69%	-62.23%	+25.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.20%	40.31%	-11.11%

Volatility

ETHB.DE vs. XLME.DE - Volatility Comparison

21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) have volatilities of 18.14% and 17.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHB.DE	XLME.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.14%	17.53%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.81%	47.22%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.96%	74.75%	-9.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.81%	89.13%	-21.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.81%	89.13%	-21.32%