PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ETHB.DE
21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP
-28.41%-12.49%43.63%97.31%-65.06%
ABCH.DE
21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP
-23.90%31.27%63.37%169.63%-76.01%
Different Trading Currencies

ETHB.DE is traded in USD, while ABCH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ABCH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHB.DE achieves a -28.41% return, which is significantly lower than ABCH.DE's -23.90% return.


ETHB.DE

1D
3.49%
1M
4.31%
YTD
-28.41%
6M
-50.82%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
10Y*

ABCH.DE

1D
-2.53%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-23.90%
6M
-22.19%
1Y
42.22%
3Y*
51.22%
5Y*
-5.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHB.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ABCH.DE's 2.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHB.DE
ETHB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ETHB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ABCH.DE
ABCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ABCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHB.DEABCH.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.66

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

1.36

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.16

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.38

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.40

3.09

-2.68

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the ABCH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHB.DE and ABCH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHB.DEABCH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.66

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

-0.06

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ETHB.DE and ABCH.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHB.DE nor ABCH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHB.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum ABCH.DE drawdown of -93.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB.DE and ABCH.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHB.DEABCH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.31%

-92.87%

+22.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.68%

-31.22%

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.38%

-71.03%

+16.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.69%

-72.96%

+36.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.20%

13.82%

+15.38%

Volatility

ETHB.DE vs. ABCH.DE - Volatility Comparison

21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.14% compared to 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) at 12.83%. This indicates that ETHB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABCH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHB.DEABCH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.14%

12.83%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.81%

45.62%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.96%

63.86%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.81%

86.85%

-19.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.81%

86.50%

-18.69%