ETHB.DE vs. ETHA
ETHB.DE (21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ETHB.DE is actively managed, while ETHA is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHB.DE charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ETHA.
Performance
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETHB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ETHA
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 11.26%
- 6M
- -42.40%
- YTD
- -36.11%
- 1Y
- -46.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.70%
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETHB.DE 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP | 15.27% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 20.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHB.DE and ETHA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank
ETHB.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHA
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETP (ETHB.DE) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHB.DE | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHB.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHB.DE and ETHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHB.DE | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -67.91% | +62.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -60.84% | +55.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -34.74% | +33.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.89% | — |
Volatility
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHB.DE | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.04% | 67.86% | -22.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.04% | 71.99% | -26.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.04% | 71.99% | -26.95% |
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHB.DE has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHB.DE vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHB.DE nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHB.DE and ETHA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for ETHB.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for ETHB.DE and 0.25% for ETHA.
Find the right allocation for ETHB.DE and ETHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer