ETHA vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
ETHA and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate-New York Variant. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both ETHA and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ETHA vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETHA vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -29.42% | -11.31% | -3.62% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | -0.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -29.42% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return.
ETHA
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- -29.42%
- 6M
- -49.76%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETHA vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ETHA vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA
IWM
ETHA vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHA | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 1.11 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 1.66 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.82 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 6.76 | -6.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHA | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.11 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.34 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA and IWM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETHA vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
ETHA vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -59.05% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -13.74% | -47.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.74% | -7.91% | -48.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -10.83% | -19.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.40% | 3.70% | +26.70% |
Volatility
ETHA vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 7.47% | +11.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.69% | 14.47% | +39.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.12% | 23.18% | +52.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.10% | 22.55% | +52.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.10% | 22.99% | +52.11% |