ETHA vs. IQLT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHA is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHA returned -34.33% vs 18.29% for IQLT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.

Performance

ETHA vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -43.96% return, which is significantly lower than IQLT's 9.81% return.

ETHA

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -27.59%
• YTD: -43.96%
• 6M: -45.98%
• 1Y: -34.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQLT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 11.22%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHA vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	-43.96%	-11.31%	-4.89%
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	9.81%	25.42%	-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and IQLT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.39

Return for Risk

ETHA vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA

ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IQLT

IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 37
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHA	IQLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	1.13	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	1.67	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.20	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	1.63	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	6.18	-7.16

ETHA vs. IQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHA Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the IQLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHA and IQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -67.56%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and IQLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHA	IQLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.56%	-32.21%	-35.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.56%	-10.38%	-57.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.65%	-0.04%	-65.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-6.21%	-27.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.22%	2.74%	+36.48%

Volatility

ETHA vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 17.30% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) at 5.41%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHA	IQLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.30%	5.41%	+11.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.58%	12.72%	+33.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.29%	15.00%	+54.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.65%	16.55%	+56.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.65%	17.00%	+55.65%

ETHA vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHA vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison

ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	2.12%	2.33%	2.87%	2.27%	3.14%	2.24%	1.61%	2.28%	2.72%	2.36%	2.91%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHA and IQLT in my portfolio?

ETHA and IQLT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHA or IQLT?

ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to IQLT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -67.56% vs IQLT's -32.21%.

Which ETF is better, ETHA or IQLT?

On 1-year performance, IQLT leads with 18.29% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHA or IQLT?

Over the 1-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 18.29% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHA or IQLT?

ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHA or IQLT?

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

What is the main difference between ETHA and IQLT?

ETHA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.30% for IQLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.