ETHA vs. BFJL
ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHA is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, ETHA returned -37.67% vs -16.19% for BFJL. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
ETHA vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -36.78% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -4.41% return.
ETHA
- 1D
- 6.06%
- 1M
- 12.81%
- 6M
- -41.45%
- YTD
- -36.78%
- 1Y
- -37.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFJL
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- -16.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -36.78% | 17.62% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -4.41% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHA and BFJL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ETHA and BFJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHA vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHA
BFJL
ETHA vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHA | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.80 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.76 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -1.07 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHA vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -67.91%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHA | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.91% | -21.27% | -46.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.91% | -21.27% | -46.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.25% | -18.41% | -42.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.53% | -12.63% | -21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.21% | 15.19% | +28.02% |
Volatility
ETHA vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 16.93% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) at 2.80%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHA | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.93% | 2.80% | +14.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.63% | 6.98% | +40.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.64% | 13.26% | +55.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.20% | 13.31% | +58.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.20% | 13.31% | +58.89% |
ETHA vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHA vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.41% | 1.35% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHA and BFJL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHA has higher volatility (16.93%) compared to BFJL (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -67.91% vs BFJL's -21.27%.
On 1-year performance, BFJL leads with -16.19% vs -37.67% for ETHA. On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BFJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BFJL has performed better with a -16.19% return vs -37.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJL.
BFJL has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.
ETHA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ETHA and 0.90% for BFJL.
ETHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHA and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer