PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHA vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHA vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-29.42%-11.31%-3.62%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
-2.21%22.41%3.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHA achieves a -29.42% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's -2.21% return.


ETHA

1D
3.67%
1M
9.02%
YTD
-29.42%
6M
-49.76%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACWI

1D
3.11%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-2.21%
6M
0.97%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHA vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHAACWIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

1.20

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.77

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.79

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.39

8.26

-7.88

ETHA vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHA Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHA and ACWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHAACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

1.20

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.39

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and ACWI is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ETHA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.59%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and ACWI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHAACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.02%

-56.00%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.66%

-11.76%

-49.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.74%

-6.92%

-49.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-8.69%

-21.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.40%

2.54%

+27.86%

Volatility

ETHA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 6.38%. This indicates that ETHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHAACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.30%

6.38%

+12.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.69%

10.05%

+43.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.12%

17.48%

+58.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.10%

15.97%

+59.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.10%

17.08%

+58.02%