ETG vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
ETG is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 30, 2004. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
ETG vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETG vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | -11.37% | 36.92% | 15.46% | 21.97% | -27.62% | 33.08% | 10.08% | 43.62% | -15.90% | 33.55% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETG achieves a -11.37% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ETG has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.66%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
ETG
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -11.37%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 18.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETG vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETG has a 2.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETG vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
ETG
CSUAX
ETG vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETG | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.63 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.36 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 10.32 | -5.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETG | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.63 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETG and CSUAX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETG vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
ETG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | 7.71% | 6.72% | 8.03% | 7.02% | 9.94% | 6.02% | 6.74% | 6.83% | 9.08% | 7.69% | 8.74% | 7.93% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
ETG vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETG drawdown since its inception was -74.76%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETG and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETG | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.76% | -52.20% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.64% | -7.98% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.64% | -20.45% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.53% | -35.05% | -16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.77% | -4.38% | -9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -8.49% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 1.83% | +1.98% |
Volatility
ETG vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that ETG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETG | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 3.26% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 6.89% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 11.48% | +8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 12.89% | +6.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 14.89% | +6.26% |