ETFRX vs. PDX
Compare and contrast key facts about North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX).
ETFRX is managed by Stadion Funds. It was launched on Sep 14, 2006. PDX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2019.
Performance
ETFRX vs. PDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETFRX vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | -1.57% | 8.44% | 7.31% | 5.65% | -8.28% | 13.49% | 3.99% | 10.34% |
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 16.74% | -10.59% | 36.99% | 44.51% | 23.02% | 68.79% | -44.20% | -10.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETFRX achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 16.74% return.
ETFRX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
PDX
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 7.88%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETFRX vs. PDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is lower than PDX's 2.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETFRX vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank
ETFRX
PDX
ETFRX vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETFRX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 0.59 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.46 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 1.13 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFRX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.30 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFRX and PDX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ETFRX vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison
ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than PDX's 21.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | 0.49% | 0.48% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 3.02% |
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 21.27% | 24.34% | 6.31% | 4.30% | 5.89% | 5.28% | 14.11% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ETFRX vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and PDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFRX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.11% | -80.63% | +43.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -20.21% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.17% | -37.24% | +25.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -15.21% | +10.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -18.92% | +12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 8.25% | -5.61% |
Volatility
ETFRX vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) is 3.60%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that ETFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETFRX | PDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.49% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 11.47% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 22.80% | -12.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.39% | 25.81% | -16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 36.86% | -26.45% |