PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETFRX vs. ETFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETFRX achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than ETFOX's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ETFRX has underperformed ETFOX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while ETFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.


ETFRX

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.44%
6M
4.06%
YTD
6.08%
1Y
14.45%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
6.40%
ALL TIME*
4.60%

ETFOX

1D
1.57%
1M
-1.07%
6M
5.22%
YTD
7.08%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.10%
ALL TIME*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETFRX
North Square Tactical Defensive Fund
6.08%8.44%7.31%5.65%-8.28%13.49%3.99%12.46%-2.99%15.26%
ETFOX
North Square Tactical Growth Fund
7.08%14.69%15.45%16.55%-14.19%12.43%15.74%15.00%-4.12%12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ETFRX and ETFOX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2006

0.88

The correlation between ETFRX and ETFOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (5 years) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETFRX vs. ETFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETFRX
ETFRX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ETFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ETFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ETFOX
ETFOX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ETFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ETFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETFRXETFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.84

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

7.35

-1.42

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the ETFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETFRX and ETFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, smaller than the maximum ETFOX drawdown of -41.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and ETFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETFRXETFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.11%

-41.32%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-8.15%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.98%

-14.63%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.17%

-17.86%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.30%

-18.47%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-2.17%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-5.40%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.04%

+0.02%

Volatility

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) is 2.68%, while North Square Tactical Growth Fund (ETFOX) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that ETFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETFRXETFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

3.20%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

8.86%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

11.12%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

12.54%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

12.43%

-1.96%

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ETFOX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETFRX vs. ETFOX - Dividend Comparison

ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than ETFOX's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETFOX
North Square Tactical Growth Fund
1.21%1.29%2.36%0.98%7.75%4.75%0.02%4.81%2.65%0.00%0.20%0.64%
ETFRX
North Square Tactical Defensive Fund
0.46%0.48%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.38%0.00%2.25%0.00%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ETFRX and ETFOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETFOX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to ETFRX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETFRX dropped -37.11% vs ETFOX's -41.32%.

ETFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETFRX and ETFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer