ETFRX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
ETFRX is managed by Stadion Funds. It was launched on Sep 14, 2006. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | -1.57% | 8.44% | 7.31% | 5.65% | -8.28% | 13.49% | 3.99% | 12.46% | -2.99% | 15.26% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -1.58% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 29.61% | 15.15% | -1.17% | 3.33% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETFRX having a -1.57% return and COTZX slightly lower at -1.58%. Over the past 10 years, ETFRX has underperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.
ETFRX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
COTZX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETFRX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETFRX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
ETFRX
COTZX
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETFRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.49 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 2.39 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.41 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 12.35 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETFRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.49 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.96 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.63 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETFRX and COTZX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
ETFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than COTZX's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFRX North Square Tactical Defensive Fund | 0.49% | 0.48% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 3.02% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.42% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.11%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETFRX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETFRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.11% | -47.48% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -5.40% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.17% | -17.80% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.30% | -17.80% | -3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -2.62% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -3.49% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.05% | +1.59% |
Volatility
ETFRX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
North Square Tactical Defensive Fund (ETFRX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 2.55%. This indicates that ETFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETFRX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 2.55% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 3.61% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 8.58% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.39% | 7.30% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 7.36% | +3.05% |