ETEC vs. RBIL
ETEC (iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Emerging Green Technologies Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETEC returned 61.83% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ETEC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
ETEC vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETEC achieves a 25.99% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.
ETEC
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 25.99%
- 6M
- 24.23%
- 1Y
- 61.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETEC vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETEC iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF | 25.99% | 27.19% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.31% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETEC and RBIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETEC vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
ETEC
RBIL
ETEC vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETEC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 2.06 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 7.59 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.92 | 44.07 | -27.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETEC vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETEC drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEC and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETEC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.71% | -0.52% | -39.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -0.52% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.51% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -0.07% | -14.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 0.09% | +3.58% |
Volatility
ETEC vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ETEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETEC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 0.36% | +10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.15% | 0.85% | +17.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.99% | 0.95% | +22.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 1.07% | +23.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 1.07% | +23.18% |
ETEC vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETEC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETEC vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
ETEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEC iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF | 0.42% | 0.33% | 1.24% | 4.18% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETEC and RBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETEC has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEC dropped -39.71% vs RBIL's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, ETEC leads with 61.83% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETEC has performed better with a 61.83% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ETEC.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.42% for ETEC.
ETEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ETEC tracks Morningstar Global Emerging Green Technologies Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ETEC and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETEC and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer