PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETB vs. SDAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETB vs. SDAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETB achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than SDAIX's 6.16% return.


ETB

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.02%
YTD
4.96%
6M
5.97%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.49%

SDAIX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.76%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETB vs. SDAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
4.96%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.68%0.43%29.42%
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
6.16%14.14%13.81%16.25%-17.87%22.93%11.87%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ETB and SDAIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.65

The correlation between ETB and SDAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETB vs. SDAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SDAIX
SDAIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SDAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SDAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETB vs. SDAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETBSDAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.33

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

10.82

+0.75

ETB vs. SDAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETB Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SDAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETB and SDAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETBSDAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.03

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.85

-0.45

Drawdowns

ETB vs. SDAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than SDAIX's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and SDAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETBSDAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.09%

-24.26%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.37%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-14.25%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-22.89%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.71%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-4.99%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.80%

-0.06%

Volatility

ETB vs. SDAIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) at 2.39%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETBSDAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.39%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

7.60%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

9.58%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

12.46%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

13.40%

+4.61%

ETB vs. SDAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SDAIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETB vs. SDAIX - Dividend Comparison

ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, while SDAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.20%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%28.80%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETB and SDAIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SDAIX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETB dropped -51.09% vs SDAIX's -24.26%.

SDAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETB and SDAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer