ETB vs. PPFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX).
ETB is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 29, 2005. PPFIX is managed by Princeton. It was launched on Nov 15, 2016.
Performance
ETB vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETB vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETB Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund | -3.57% | 11.16% | 26.22% | 7.50% | -16.59% | 23.68% | 0.43% | 32.40% | -12.75% | 12.37% |
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund | 1.35% | 7.45% | 4.29% | 7.54% | 1.84% | 14.93% | 3.32% | 8.75% | -5.38% | 10.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETB achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than PPFIX's 1.35% return.
ETB
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
PPFIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETB vs. PPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFIX's 1.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETB vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank
ETB
PPFIX
ETB vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETB | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.66 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.04 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 2.34 | -1.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.90 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 14.59 | -8.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETB | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.66 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.57 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.80 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETB and PPFIX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ETB vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison
ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than PPFIX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETB Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund | 8.80% | 8.31% | 8.21% | 8.62% | 9.63% | 7.57% | 8.64% | 7.90% | 9.64% | 7.75% | 7.85% | 7.77% |
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund | 5.62% | 5.62% | 6.24% | 6.86% | 1.92% | 7.16% | 0.44% | 0.23% | 0.93% | 2.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ETB vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than PPFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and PPFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETB | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.09% | -15.64% | -35.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -2.77% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | -4.49% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -0.07% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -1.37% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 0.47% | +1.96% |
Volatility
ETB vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.33%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETB | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 0.33% | +5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 0.67% | +8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 3.59% | +13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 3.87% | +12.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 7.18% | +10.83% |