PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETB vs. GTSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETB vs. GTSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETB achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than GTSOX's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ETB has outperformed GTSOX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while GTSOX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.


ETB

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.02%
YTD
4.96%
6M
5.97%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.49%

GTSOX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.77%
6M
6.00%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETB vs. GTSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
4.96%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.68%0.43%32.40%-12.75%9.52%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
5.77%7.73%13.79%14.59%-11.69%18.06%4.22%18.45%-4.68%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ETB and GTSOX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.58

The correlation between ETB and GTSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETB vs. GTSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSOX
GTSOX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GTSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETB vs. GTSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETBGTSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.82

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.03

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

20.73

-9.16

ETB vs. GTSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETB Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the GTSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETB and GTSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETBGTSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.75

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.56

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.59

-0.18

Drawdowns

ETB vs. GTSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than GTSOX's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and GTSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETBGTSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.09%

-29.21%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-5.05%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-22.03%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-22.03%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-29.21%

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.14%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-2.97%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.73%

+1.01%

Volatility

ETB vs. GTSOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) at 0.59%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETBGTSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

0.59%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

5.07%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

5.56%

+5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

13.18%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

13.44%

+4.57%

ETB vs. GTSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETB vs. GTSOX - Dividend Comparison

ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than GTSOX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.20%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
6.90%7.47%12.31%0.00%0.00%13.35%0.00%7.56%2.62%6.57%5.01%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETB and GTSOX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to GTSOX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETB dropped -51.09% vs GTSOX's -29.21%.

GTSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETB and GTSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer