PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETB vs. GTSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETB vs. GTSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETB achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than GTSOX's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ETB has outperformed GTSOX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while GTSOX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.43% annualized return.


ETB

1D
1.24%
1M
0.29%
6M
4.31%
YTD
6.27%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.43%
ALL TIME*
8.15%

GTSOX

1D
1.10%
1M
0.95%
6M
6.54%
YTD
8.10%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.43%
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$610.29K$614.00K$694.48K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ETB vs. GTSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
6.27%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.68%0.43%32.40%-12.75%9.52%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
8.10%7.73%13.79%14.59%-11.69%18.06%4.22%18.45%-4.68%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ETB and GTSOX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.58

The correlation between ETB and GTSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETB vs. GTSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSOX
GTSOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GTSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETB vs. GTSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETBGTSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.66

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.87

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

19.33

-10.73

ETB vs. GTSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETB Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the GTSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETB and GTSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETB vs. GTSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than GTSOX's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and GTSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETBGTSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.09%

-29.21%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-5.05%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-22.03%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-22.03%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-29.21%

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-2.94%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.75%

+1.10%

Volatility

ETB vs. GTSOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) at 1.69%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETBGTSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

1.69%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

5.51%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

5.96%

+5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

13.20%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

13.40%

+4.55%

ETB vs. GTSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETB vs. GTSOX - Dividend Comparison

ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, less than GTSOX's 14.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.21%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
14.85%7.47%12.31%0.00%0.00%13.35%0.00%7.56%2.62%6.57%5.01%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETB and GTSOX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to GTSOX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETB dropped -51.09% vs GTSOX's -29.21%.

GTSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETB and GTSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer