PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETB vs. BPRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETB vs. BPRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETB having a 5.02% return and BPRLX slightly higher at 5.08%.


ETB

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.14%
YTD
5.02%
6M
5.90%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
8.48%

BPRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.67%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.70%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETB vs. BPRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
5.02%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.68%0.43%32.40%-12.75%0.69%
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
5.08%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ETB and BPRLX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017

0.62

The correlation between ETB and BPRLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETB vs. BPRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETB vs. BPRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETBBPRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.61

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.29

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

20.03

-8.31

ETB vs. BPRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the BPRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETB and BPRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETBBPRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.65

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.77

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.71

-0.30

Drawdowns

ETB vs. BPRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than BPRLX's maximum drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and BPRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETBBPRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.09%

-24.28%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-4.12%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-11.63%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-24.28%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-4.11%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.68%

+1.06%

Volatility

ETB vs. BPRLX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) at 0.69%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETBBPRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

0.69%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

4.28%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

5.14%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

15.96%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

15.06%

+2.96%

ETB vs. BPRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BPRLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETB vs. BPRLX - Dividend Comparison

ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, less than BPRLX's 11.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.94%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%0.00%0.00%
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.20%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETB and BPRLX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to BPRLX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETB dropped -51.09% vs BPRLX's -24.28%.

BPRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETB and BPRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer