PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETB vs. BPRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETB vs. BPRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETB achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than BPRLX's 6.00% return.


ETB

1D
0.91%
1M
1.20%
6M
4.71%
YTD
7.23%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
8.19%

BPRLX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.58%
6M
5.25%
YTD
6.00%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$609.32K$634.97K$708.53K

ETB vs. BPRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
7.23%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.68%0.43%32.40%-12.75%0.75%
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
6.00%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ETB and BPRLX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.62

The correlation between ETB and BPRLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETB vs. BPRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETB vs. BPRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETBBPRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.61

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

15.54

-5.84

ETB vs. BPRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETB Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BPRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETB and BPRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETB vs. BPRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETB drawdown since its inception was -51.09%, which is greater than BPRLX's maximum drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETB and BPRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETBBPRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.09%

-24.28%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-4.12%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-11.63%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-24.28%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-4.04%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.69%

+1.16%

Volatility

ETB vs. BPRLX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) at 1.36%. This indicates that ETB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETBBPRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.36%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

4.55%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

5.30%

+6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.97%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

14.93%

+3.02%

ETB vs. BPRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETB has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BPRLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETB vs. BPRLX - Dividend Comparison

ETB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than BPRLX's 11.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.83%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%0.00%0.00%
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.14%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETB and BPRLX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to BPRLX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETB dropped -51.09% vs BPRLX's -24.28%.

BPRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETB and BPRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer