PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESUS.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESUS.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESUS.L having a 11.78% return and VOO slightly lower at 11.32%.


ESUS.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.13%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.14%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.03%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist
11.78%7.49%26.65%21.14%-12.50%10.31%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.79%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%9.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ESUS.L and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2021

0.57

The correlation between ESUS.L and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESUS.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESUS.L
ESUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ESUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESUS.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.84

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

14.73

-2.36

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESUS.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESUS.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.95

-0.09

Drawdowns

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESUS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESUS.L and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESUS.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-26.09%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-7.66%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-21.93%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.44%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.30%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.00%

+0.30%

Volatility

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.68%. This indicates that ESUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESUS.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.68%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

8.17%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

11.46%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

15.77%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

18.10%

-3.23%

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESUS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESUS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ESUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist
0.83%0.90%0.96%1.19%1.36%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESUS.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ESUS.L.

ESUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ESUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESUS.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESUS.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer