ESUM vs. MTUM
ESUM (Eventide US Market ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESUM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Eventide, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. ESUM is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESUM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
ESUM vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESUM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
ESUM
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
ESUM vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESUM Eventide US Market ETF | 12.37% | 1.23% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESUM and MTUM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESUM vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
ESUM
MTUM
ESUM vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESUM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.85 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
ESUM vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESUM drawdown since its inception was -8.13%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESUM and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESUM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -34.08% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -6.21% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
ESUM vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESUM | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 19.04% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 20.60% | -6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 21.03% | -7.24% |
ESUM vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESUM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESUM vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
ESUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESUM Eventide US Market ETF | 0.57% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESUM and MTUM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESUM.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.57% for ESUM.
ESUM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Eventide and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESUM and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for ESUM and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer