PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESS vs. VTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESS vs. VTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESS achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than VTR's 10.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESS having a 6.41% annualized return and VTR not far ahead at 6.45%.


ESS

1D
1.13%
1M
6.25%
YTD
10.69%
6M
12.44%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
6.41%

VTR

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.02%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
26.63%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESS vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
10.69%-4.98%18.36%21.97%-37.76%52.40%-18.09%25.92%4.83%6.82%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
10.03%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ESS and VTR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1998

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between ESS and VTR has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

ESS:

$9.59

VTR:

$0.55

PE Ratio

ESS:

29.59

VTR:

153.49

PEG Ratio

ESS:

2.07

VTR:

4.39

PS Ratio

ESS:

7.19

VTR:

6.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESS:

$1.91B

VTR:

$6.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESS:

$1.32B

VTR:

-$261.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESS:

$1.44B

VTR:

$2.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESS vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESS
ESS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ESS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESS vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESSVTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.36

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

2.92

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

11.03

-10.84

ESS vs. VTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the VTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESS and VTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESS vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESS drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESS and VTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESSVTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-83.84%

+21.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-12.52%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-19.35%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-41.80%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-76.92%

+32.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-6.36%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-18.38%

+7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.80%

3.31%

+6.49%

Volatility

ESS vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) is 4.92%, while Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that ESS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESSVTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

8.80%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

14.88%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

19.35%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

25.02%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

34.78%

-8.97%

Dividends

ESS vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison

ESS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than VTR's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
3.63%3.88%2.57%3.73%4.15%2.37%3.50%2.59%3.03%2.90%2.75%2.41%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.32%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Financials

ESS vs. VTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
484.76M
1.66B
(ESS) Total Revenue
(VTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESS vs. VTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Ventas, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
39.6%
Portfolio components
ESS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.50M and revenue of 484.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

ESS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 155.19M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ESS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -6.02M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESS and VTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTR has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to ESS (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESS dropped -62.67% vs VTR's -83.84%.

VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESS and VTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer