PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESS vs. 0012.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) and Henderson Land (0012.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESS is traded in USD, while 0012.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0012.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESS achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than 0012.HK's -2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ESS has underperformed 0012.HK with an annualized return of 6.41%, while 0012.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 6.94% annualized return.


ESS

1D
1.13%
1M
4.34%
YTD
10.69%
6M
12.44%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
6.41%

0012.HK

1D
0.99%
1M
-17.87%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
-6.77%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
10.69%-4.98%18.36%21.97%-37.76%52.40%-18.09%25.92%4.83%6.82%
0012.HK
Henderson Land
-2.43%28.05%6.29%-4.70%-12.98%14.71%-15.82%24.63%-5.26%54.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ESS and 0012.HK is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.06

The correlation between ESS and 0012.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESS vs. 0012.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESS
ESS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ESS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

0012.HK
0012.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
0012.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0012.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
0012.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
0012.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
0012.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) and Henderson Land (0012.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESS0012.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.10

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

0.50

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

1.46

-1.27

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the 0012.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESS and 0012.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESS drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum 0012.HK drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESS and 0012.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESS0012.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-70.30%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-22.88%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-26.90%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

-46.68%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-48.04%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-22.11%

+14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-19.37%

+8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.80%

7.79%

+2.01%

Volatility

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) is 4.92%, while Henderson Land (0012.HK) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that ESS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0012.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESS0012.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

5.74%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

19.58%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

27.23%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

27.64%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

25.15%

+0.66%

Dividends

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Dividend Comparison

ESS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than 0012.HK's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0012.HK
Henderson Land
4.68%6.40%7.63%7.48%6.61%5.42%5.95%4.71%4.15%2.93%4.47%3.30%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
3.63%3.88%2.57%3.73%4.15%2.37%3.50%2.59%3.03%2.90%2.75%2.41%

Financials

ESS vs. 0012.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Henderson Land. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ESS values in USD, 0012.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


ESS and 0012.HK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESS and 0012.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer