PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0012.HK vs. COV.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Henderson Land (0012.HK) and Covivio SA (COV.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0012.HK is traded in HKD, while COV.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the COV.PA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0012.HK achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than COV.PA's -3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, 0012.HK has outperformed COV.PA with an annualized return of 4.31%, while COV.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return.


0012.HK

1D
-1.24%
1M
-9.61%
YTD
4.66%
6M
0.38%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
4.31%

COV.PA

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-3.33%
6M
0.53%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*
0.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0012.HK
Henderson Land
4.66%28.27%5.75%-4.71%-12.83%15.35%-16.23%12.70%-13.45%42.06%
COV.PA
Covivio SA
-3.35%34.68%0.57%-5.09%-23.77%-5.75%-12.22%23.04%-10.68%32.58%

Correlation

The correlation between 0012.HK and COV.PA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0012.HK vs. COV.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0012.HK
0012.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
0012.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0012.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
0012.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
0012.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
0012.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

COV.PA
COV.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
COV.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COV.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COV.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
COV.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COV.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henderson Land (0012.HK) and Covivio SA (COV.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0012.HKCOV.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.47

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.16

1.17

+2.99

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0012.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the COV.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0012.HK and COV.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0012.HKCOV.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.37

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.13

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.03

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.04

+0.12

Drawdowns

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0012.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.71%, roughly equal to the maximum COV.PA drawdown of -70.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0012.HK and COV.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0012.HKCOV.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.71%

-70.99%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.51%

-18.95%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.91%

-24.40%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.30%

-55.90%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.65%

-63.87%

+15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.90%

-26.06%

+9.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.41%

-23.70%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

7.62%

-0.52%

Volatility

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Volatility Comparison

Henderson Land (0012.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Covivio SA (COV.PA) at 6.49%. This indicates that 0012.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COV.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0012.HKCOV.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

6.49%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

19.96%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

23.66%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.60%

29.51%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

31.63%

-7.01%

Dividends

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Dividend Comparison

0012.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than COV.PA's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0012.HK
Henderson Land
4.39%6.40%7.63%7.48%6.61%5.42%5.95%5.05%4.75%3.35%3.87%2.56%
COV.PA
Covivio SA
2.80%1.79%6.77%5.05%6.76%4.99%6.37%4.55%5.34%1.09%3.72%1.58%

Financials

0012.HK vs. COV.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henderson Land and Covivio SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0012.HK values in HKD, COV.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


0012.HK and COV.PA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0012.HK and COV.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer