ESPO vs. IXC
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.88%/yr vs 19.39%/yr for IXC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.
Performance
ESPO vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -14.87% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 30.67% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- 1Y
- -15.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.15%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
ESPO vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -14.87% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 30.67% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -17.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and IXC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ESPO and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPO vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
IXC
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
IXC
-
Technology
ESPO
IXC
-
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Energy
ESPO
-
IXC
Financial Services
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Healthcare
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
IXC
ESPO vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.41 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.82 | -5.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 14.26 | -15.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 2.48 | -3.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.83 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.32 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -67.88% | +16.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -9.66% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -19.06% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -24.93% | -23.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.99% | -5.96% | -21.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.05% | -17.47% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.58% | 3.26% | +12.32% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.84%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 6.55% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 15.51% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 18.79% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 23.52% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 26.85% | -1.11% |
ESPO vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than IXC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.46% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and IXC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to ESPO (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 19.39% vs 5.88% for ESPO. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 19.39% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.46% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.46% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer