ESPO vs. BNGE
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and BNGE (First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BNGE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S-Network Streaming & Gaming Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPO returned 19.46%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for BNGE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BNGE.
Performance
ESPO vs. BNGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly higher than BNGE's -18.00% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BNGE
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -18.00%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- 1Y
- -6.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. BNGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -27.74% |
BNGE First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF | -18.00% | 35.18% | 19.23% | 37.21% | -28.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and BNGE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESPO and BNGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. BNGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
BNGE
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
BNGE
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
BNGE
Technology
ESPO
BNGE
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Energy
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Healthcare
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
BNGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. BNGE — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
BNGE
ESPO vs. BNGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | BNGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.95 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.24 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.47 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | BNGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | -0.37 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. BNGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than BNGE's maximum drawdown of -40.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and BNGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | BNGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -40.54% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -27.88% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -27.88% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -24.44% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -13.82% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 14.00% | +1.30% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. BNGE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF (BNGE) at 4.26%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | BNGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 13.27% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 17.84% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 25.18% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 25.18% | +0.57% |
ESPO vs. BNGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BNGE's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. BNGE - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than BNGE's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNGE First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF | 1.08% | 0.89% | 0.01% | 0.81% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and BNGE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to BNGE (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs BNGE's -40.54%.
On 3-year performance, ESPO leads with 19.46% vs 13.39% for BNGE. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BNGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BNGE.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.08% for BNGE.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNGE is Technology Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BNGE tracks S-Network Streaming & Gaming Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.70% for BNGE.
BNGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and BNGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer