ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L
ESPJ.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while FTWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESPJ.L returned 13.44% vs 28.92% for FTWG.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPJ.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FTWG.L.
Performance
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPJ.L is traded in USD, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPJ.L achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 11.59% return.
ESPJ.L
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FTWG.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 28.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.36% | 18.97% | 5.95% | 5.46% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 11.59% | 22.73% | 17.92% | 8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPJ.L and FTWG.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ESPJ.L and FTWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Basic Materials
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Real Estate
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Industrials
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Healthcare
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Energy
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Communication Services
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Utilities
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Technology
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPJ.L
FTWG.L
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPJ.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.13 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 13.65 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPJ.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.45 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.59 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPJ.L and FTWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPJ.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -16.89% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -9.20% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -0.73% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -1.90% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.11% | +0.73% |
Volatility
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that ESPJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPJ.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.49% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 9.01% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 11.73% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 13.13% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 13.13% | +3.64% |
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPJ.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESPJ.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPJ.L and FTWG.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESPJ.L.
ESPJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FTWG.L is Global Equities. ESPJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPJ.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPJ.L and FTWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer