PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMV vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMV vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -35.77% return.


ESMV

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.16%
6M
6.27%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.96%

SMST

1D
8.37%
1M
5.47%
6M
-29.35%
YTD
-35.77%
1Y
128.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.55K$9.03K$12.67K
$15.35M$15.12M$17.58M

ESMV vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
7.33%5.34%0.42%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-35.77%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and SMST is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMV vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESMV
ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESMV vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESMVSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.00

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

3.68

+0.38

ESMV vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMVSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-99.25%

+79.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-85.39%

+78.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-97.48%

+96.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-91.08%

+85.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

46.35%

-44.07%

Volatility

ESMV vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) is 2.50%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 38.14%. This indicates that ESMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMVSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

38.14%

-35.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

135.29%

-128.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

151.04%

-141.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

166.75%

-153.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.11%

166.75%

-153.64%

ESMV vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESMV vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.50%1.56%1.71%1.75%1.66%0.24%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMV and SMST have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (38.14%) compared to ESMV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMV dropped -19.77% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 128.37% vs 9.71% for ESMV. On fees, ESMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ESMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 128.37% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

ESMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

ESMV is categorized as Low Volatility, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMV and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer