PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMV vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMV vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


ESMV

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.36%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.39%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESMV vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
5.28%5.34%12.83%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and IBIT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMV vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMV
ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMV vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMVIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.86

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

-0.79

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

-1.36

+4.34

ESMV vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMVIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

-0.89

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.30

+0.14

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMVIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-49.36%

+29.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-49.36%

+42.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-48.10%

+47.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-16.02%

+10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

28.44%

-26.16%

Volatility

ESMV vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) is 2.25%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ESMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMVIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

9.50%

-7.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.26%

34.44%

-28.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

43.73%

-33.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

50.19%

-36.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

50.19%

-36.95%

ESMV vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESMV vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.58%1.56%1.71%1.75%1.66%0.24%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMV and IBIT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ESMV (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMV dropped -19.77% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, ESMV leads with 6.76% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, ESMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ESMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESMV has performed better with a 6.76% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

ESMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ESMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ESMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.25% for IBIT.

ESMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMV and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer