ESMV vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ESMV (iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESMV returned 6.29% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. ESMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

ESMV vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.

ESMV

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 6.29%
• 3Y*: 10.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESMV vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	4.06%	5.34%	13.06%	5.72%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.43%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and IBIC is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.01

Return for Risk

ESMV vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMV

ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 20
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMV vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESMV	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	4.99	-4.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	8.97	-8.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	2.22	-1.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	16.56	-15.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	58.67	-55.92

ESMV vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESMV	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.77%	-0.90%	-18.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-0.27%	-6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-0.08%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-0.10%	-5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	0.08%	+2.21%

Volatility

ESMV vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that ESMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESMV	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	0.17%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	0.67%	+5.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	0.89%	+9.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	1.56%	+11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.20%	1.56%	+11.64%

ESMV vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESMV vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.55%	1.56%	1.71%	1.75%	1.66%	0.24%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.58%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESMV and IBIC in my portfolio?

ESMV and IBIC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESMV or IBIC?

ESMV has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMV dropped -19.77% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, ESMV or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, ESMV leads with 6.29% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESMV or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, ESMV has performed better with a 6.29% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESMV or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESMV or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.55% for ESMV.

What is the main difference between ESMV and IBIC?

ESMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ESMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.